Subject	Hmmmmmmmmm.............. (n/m)
Posted by	oOoEveroOo on June 04, 2001 at 7:05 PM
	This message has been viewed 18 times.
In Reply To	5-sp Zs are slower than idiot box Zs. (n/m) posted by SactoTodd on June 04, 2001 at 05:11 PM
Message
Follow Ups	My chances against a '93 RX-7??>>>> - dunkmstr 14:12:43 06/04/01 You should be able to take him. (n/m) - Gage 14:20:32 06/04/01 Drive Like You Were In Dukes Of Hazard, You'll Be Good To Go (n/m) - pornallstar 14:30:34 06/04/01 still gonna be pretty close as long as his rx-7 isnt broken - NIZZAN 14:40:25 06/04/01 You should spank him (n/m) - milano13 15:15:05 06/04/01 comes down to driver. cars are very close in perf. (n/m) - twinz 15:26:37 06/04/01 rx-7. (n/m) - SactoTodd 15:34:31 06/04/01 You'll take him. Auto Rx7's are alot slower than sticks. (n/m) - Jackie Chan 16:37:13 06/04/01 5-sp Zs are slower than idiot box Zs. (n/m) - SactoTodd 17:11:37 06/04/01 Wanna bet? (n/m) - oOoEveroOo 19:04:55 06/04/01 Hmmmmmmmmm.............. (n/m) - oOoEveroOo 19:05:10 06/04/01 Don't get behind him, you'll get sprayed with oil. (n/m) - jmardy 17:34:52 06/04/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.